First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit

June 27, 2009

 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 authorizes a tax credit of up to $8,000 for qualified first-time home buyers purchasing a principal residence on or after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009.

 The following questions and answers provide basic information about the tax credit. If you have more specific questions, we strongly encourage you to consult a qualified tax advisor or legal professional about your unique situation.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Home Buyer Tax Credit  

 1. Who is eligible to claim the tax credit?

First-time home buyers purchasing any kind of home—new or resale—are eligible for the tax credit. To qualify for the tax credit, a home purchase must occur on or after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009. For the purposes of the tax credit, the purchase date is the date when closing occurs and the title to the property transfers to the home owner.

  2. What is the definition of a first-time home buyer?

The law defines “first-time home buyer” as a buyer who has not owned a principal residence during the three-year period prior to the purchase. For married taxpayers, the law tests the homeownership history of both the home buyer and his/her spouse.

 For example, if you have not owned a home in the past three years but your spouse has owned a principal residence, neither you nor your spouse qualifies for the first-time home buyer tax credit. However, unmarried joint purchasers may allocate the credit amount to any buyer who qualifies as a first-time buyer, such as may occur if a parent jointly purchases a home with a son or daughter. Ownership of a vacation home or rental property not used as a principal residence does not disqualify a buyer as a first-time home buyer.

 3. How is the amount of the tax credit determined?

The tax credit is equal to 10 percent of the home’s purchase price up to a maximum of $8,000.

 4. Are there any income limits for claiming the tax credit?

Yes. The income limit for single taxpayers is $75,000; the limit is $150,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return. The tax credit amount is reduced for buyers with a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of more than $75,000 for single taxpayers and $150,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return. The phaseout range for the tax credit program is equal to $20,000. That is, the tax credit amount is reduced to zero for taxpayers with MAGI of more than $95,000 (single) or $170,000 (married) and is reduced proportionally for taxpayers with MAGIs between these amounts.

 5. What is “modified adjusted gross income”?

Modified adjusted gross income or MAGI is defined by the IRS. To find it, a taxpayer must first determine “adjusted gross income” or AGI. AGI is total income for a year minus certain deductions (known as “adjustments” or “above-the-line deductions”), but before itemized deductions from Schedule A or personal exemptions are subtracted. On Forms 1040 and 1040A, AGI is the last number on page 1 and first number on page 2 of the form. For Form 1040-EZ, AGI appears on line 4 (as of 2007). Note that AGI includes all forms of income including wages, salaries, interest income, dividends and capital gains.

To determine modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), add to AGI certain amounts of foreign-earned income. See IRS Form 5405 for more details.

6. If my modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is above the limit, do I qualify for any tax credit?

Possibly. It depends on your income. Partial credits of less than $8,000 are available for some taxpayers whose MAGI exceeds the phase-out limits.

 7. Can you give me an example of how the partial tax credit is determined?

Just as an example, assume that a married couple has a modified adjusted gross income of $160,000. The applicable phase-out to qualify for the tax credit is $150,000, and the couple is $10,000 over this amount. Dividing $10,000 by the phase-out range of $20,000 yields 0.5. When you subtract 0.5 from 1.0, the result is 0.5. To determine the amount of the partial first-time home buyer tax credit that is available to this couple, multiply $8,000 by 0.5. The result is $4,000.

 Here’s another example: assume that an individual home buyer has a modified adjusted gross income of $88,000. The buyer’s income exceeds $75,000 by $13,000. Dividing $13,000 by the phase-out range of $20,000 yields 0.65. When you subtract 0.65 from 1.0, the result is 0.35. Multiplying $8,000 by 0.35 shows that the buyer is eligible for a partial tax credit of $2,800.

 Please remember that these examples are intended to provide a general idea of how the tax credit might be applied in different circumstances. You should always consult your tax advisor for information relating to your specific circumstances.

 8. How is this home buyer tax credit different from the tax credit that Congress enacted in July of 2008?

The most significant difference is that this tax credit does not have to be repaid. Because it had to be repaid, the previous “credit” was essentially an interest-free loan. This tax incentive is a true tax credit. However, home buyers must use the residence as a principal residence for at least three years or face recapture of the tax credit amount. Certain exceptions apply.

 9. How do I claim the tax credit? Do I need to complete a form or application?

Participating in the tax credit program is easy. You claim the tax credit on your federal income tax return. Specifically, home buyers should complete IRS Form 5405 to determine their tax credit amount, and then claim this amount on line 67 of the 1040 income tax form for 2009 returns (line 69 of the 1040 income tax form for 2008 returns). No other applications or forms are required, and no pre-approval is necessary. However, you will want to be sure that you qualify for the credit under the income limits and first-time home buyer tests. Note that you cannot claim the credit on Form 5405 for an intended purchase for some future date; it must be a completed purchase.

 10. What types of homes will qualify for the tax credit?

Any home that will be used as a principal residence will qualify for the credit. This includes single-family detached homes, attached homes like townhouses and condominiums, manufactured homes (also known as mobile homes) and houseboats. The definition of principal residence is identical to the one used to determine whether you may qualify for the $250,000 / $500,000 capital gain tax exclusion for principal residences.

11. I read that the tax credit is “refundable.” What does that mean?

The fact that the credit is refundable means that the home buyer credit can be claimed even if the taxpayer has little or no federal income tax liability to offset. Typically this involves the government sending the taxpayer a check for a portion or even all of the amount of the refundable tax credit.

 For example, if a qualified home buyer expected, notwithstanding the tax credit, federal income tax liability of $5,000 and had tax withholding of $4,000 for the year, then without the tax credit the taxpayer would owe the IRS $1,000 on April 15th. Suppose now that the taxpayer qualified for the $8,000 home buyer tax credit. As a result, the taxpayer would receive a check for $7,000 ($8,000 minus the $1,000 owed).

12. I purchased a home in early 2009 and have already filed to receive the $7,500 tax credit on my 2008 tax returns. How can I claim the new $8,000 tax credit instead?

Home buyers in this situation may file an amended 2008 tax return with a 1040X form. You should consult with a tax advisor to ensure you file this return properly.

 13. Instead of buying a new home from a home builder, I hired a contractor to construct a home on a lot that I already own. Do I still qualify for the tax credit?

Yes. For the purposes of the home buyer tax credit, a principal residence that is constructed by the home owner is treated by the tax code as having been “purchased” on the date the owner first occupies the house. In this situation, the date of first occupancy must be on or after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009.

 In contrast, for newly-constructed homes bought from a home builder, eligibility for the tax credit is determined by the settlement date.

 14. Can I claim the tax credit if I finance the purchase of my home under a mortgage revenue bond (MRB) program?

Yes. The tax credit can be combined with the MRB home buyer program. Note that first-time home buyers who purchased a home in 2008 may not claim the tax credit if they are participating in an MRB program.

 15. I live in the District of Columbia. Can I claim both the Washington, D.C. first-time home buyer credit and this new credit?

No. You can claim only one.

 16. I am not a U.S. citizen. Can I claim the tax credit?

Maybe. Anyone who is not a nonresident alien (as defined by the IRS), who has not owned a principal residence in the previous three years and who meets the income limits test may claim the tax credit for a qualified home purchase. The IRS provides a definition of “nonresident alien” in IRS Publication 519.

17. Is a tax credit the same as a tax deduction?

No. A tax credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction in what the taxpayer owes. That means that a taxpayer who owes $8,000 in income taxes and who receives an $8,000 tax credit would owe nothing to the IRS.

 A tax deduction is subtracted from the amount of income that is taxed. Using the same example, assume the taxpayer is in the 15 percent tax bracket and owes $8,000 in income taxes. If the taxpayer receives an $8,000 deduction, the taxpayer’s tax liability would be reduced by $1,200 (15 percent of $8,000), or lowered from $8,000 to $6,800.

 18. I bought a home in 2008. Do I qualify for this credit?

No, but if you purchased your first home between April 9, 2008 and January 1, 2009, you may qualify for a different tax credit. Please consult with your tax advisor for more information.

 19. Is there any way for a home buyer to access the money allocable to the credit sooner than waiting to file their 2009 tax return?

Yes. Prospective home buyers who believe they qualify for the tax credit are permitted to reduce their income tax withholding. Reducing tax withholding (up to the amount of the credit) will enable the buyer to accumulate cash by raising his/her take home pay. This money can then be applied to the down payment.

 Buyers should adjust their withholding amount on their W-4 via their employer or through their quarterly estimated tax payment. IRS Publication 919 contains rules and guidelines for income tax withholding. Prospective home buyers should note that if income tax withholding is reduced and the tax credit qualified purchase does not occur, then the individual would be liable for repayment to the IRS of income tax and possible interest charges and penalties.

Further, rule changes made as part of the economic stimulus legislation allow home buyers to claim the tax credit and participate in a program financed by tax-exempt bonds. Some state housing finance agencies have introduced programs that provide short-term credit acceleration loans that may be used to fund a downpayment. Prospective home buyers should inquire with their state housing finance agency to determine the availability of such a program in their community.

The National Council of State Housing Agencies (NCSHA) has compiled a list of such programs, which can be found here.

20. The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development has announced that HUD will allow “monetization” of the tax credit. What does that mean?

It means that HUD will allow buyers to apply their anticipated tax credit toward their home purchase immediately rather than waiting until they file their 2009 income taxes to receive a refund. These funds may be used for certain down payment and closing cost expenses.

 Under the guidelines announced by HUD, non-profits and FHA-approved lenders will be allowed to give home buyers short-term loans of up to $8,000.

 The guidelines also allow longer term loans secured by second liens to be used by government agencies, such as state housing finance agencies, to facilitate home sales.

 Housing finance agencies and other government entities may issue tax credit loans, the funds of which home buyers may use to satisfy the FHA 3.5% down payment requirement.

 In addition, approved FHA lenders will also be able to purchase a home buyer’s anticipated tax credit to pay closing costs and down payment costs above the 3.5% down payment that is required for FHA-insured homes.

 More information about the guidelines is available on the NAHB web site. Read the HUD mortgagee letter (pdf) and an explanation of the FHA Mortgagee Letter on Tax Credit Monetization (pdf). An FAQ about monetization (pdf) is available at the NAHB web site.

 21. If I’m qualified for the tax credit and buy a home in 2009, can I apply the tax credit against my 2008 tax return?

Yes. The law allows taxpayers to choose (“elect”) to treat qualified home purchases in 2009 as if the purchase occurred on December 31, 2008. This means that the 2008 income limit (MAGI) applies and the election accelerates when the credit can be claimed (tax filing for 2008 returns instead of for 2009 returns). A benefit of this election is that a home buyer in 2009 will know their 2008 MAGI with certainty, thereby helping the buyer know whether the income limit will reduce their credit amount.

 Taxpayers buying a home who wish to claim it on their 2008 tax return, but who have already submitted their 2008 return to the IRS, may file an amended 2008 return claiming the tax credit. You should consult with a tax professional to determine how to arrange this.

 22. For a home purchase in 2009, can I choose whether to treat the purchase as occurring in 2008 or 2009, depending on in which year my credit amount is the largest?

Yes. If the applicable income phase-out would reduce your home buyer tax credit amount in 2009 and a larger credit would be available using the 2008 MAGI amounts, then you can choose the year that yields the largest credit amount.

 NAHB is providing the information on this web site for general guidance only. The information on this site does not constitute the provision of legal advice, tax advice, accounting services, investment advice, or professional consulting of any kind nor should it be construed as such. The information provided herein should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax, accounting, legal, or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action on this information, you should consult a qualified professional adviser to whom you have provided all of the facts applicable to your particular situation or question. None of the tax information on this web site is intended to be used nor can it be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. The information is provided “as is,” with no assurance or guarantee of completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose. 

1201 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005  202-266-8200 800-368-5242

Copyright © 2009 National Association of Home Builders. All rights reserved.

For a PRINTABLE VERSION click here.


Choosing Your Mortgage Professional

June 20, 2009
By Brian Short, CMC, CRMS, GMA
 
“Shopping for a Mortgage Professional is much like shopping for a medical doctor or an attorney. Choosing your medical or legal care based on “who is the cheapest” may not really be the best strategy. You want you choose a professional who is trained, certified, experienced and has a good reputation.” 
 
Often times, this is my response to those asking for me to give them a detailed list of all their closing costs if they select me and my company to provide the financing for their upcoming home purchase or refinance of their current home.
 
I have heard of real estate industry partners telling their customers that choosing a mortgage professional is as simple as getting a “Good Faith Estimate” and comparing the costs contained on those documents.  This sets up the borrower to work with the “best liar”, too early in the 30-60 day process of finding a home, rather than getting the most professional financing help to get the deal closed correctly.
 
How can this be?  Aren’t all “Good Faith Estimates” accurate?  Aren’t all mortgage professionals the same?  Aren’t all mortgage companies the same? 
The truth is: the numbers on the “Good Faith Estimate” given too early in the process are RARELY CORRECT!  You see, the numbers on that document are affected by one or more of the following 13 variables below:

-> Sales pricegood-faith-estimate

-> Appraised value

-> Loan amount

-> Borrower’s employment status and history

-> Credit scores and payment history

-> Amount and source of down-payment

-> Date of closing

-> Immigration or citizenship status of the borrower

-> The housing type and location (Single family dwelling, Duplex, Condo, Townhouse, PUD, suburban, rural, urban, etc.)

-> The county where the home is located

-> Mortgage Interest Rate

-> The Term (length) of the Loan

-> The Title Company being used to close the loan

I have worked for several mortgage companies during my mortgage career and even owned my own company for 5 years. I know that some “loan guys” will “low-ball” the initial estimate, only to pull out the “surprise” at the closing table when your options for making any changes are very limited.  Of the 21 separate line-item fees on the “Good Faith Estimate” I give to my borrowers when they sign their loan application forms and disclosures, only one of those fees is the same for every loan and is not dependent on any of the variables listed above.

Mortgage interest rates change daily (sometime, even more often!). I could simply print off a “Good Faith Estimate” with made up numbers as some customers request (as other ”loan guys” may do) but it will not be accurate because of all of these variables I have mentioned.  That process of collecting “Good Faith Estimates” prior to having all of the above variables identified will very time-consuming and wasted effort by the borrower and “loan guys” passing out worthless forms with inaccurate numbers.

My goal is to take the worry and uncertainty out of the process of originating, processing, underwriting and closing the loan.  I help guide my borrowers through their negotiations with their seller by providing honest numbers as they become available rather than simply making up numbers to get “my hook set”.

I have been in the business for over 11 years and nearly 100% of my business comes from referral and repeat business. A businessman can not build that kind of business by being a con-man, cheating others or participating in the bait-and-switch tactics that have riddled this industry for years.

This helps my my borrowers understand how I have built my business and how I provide a level of confidence and professionalism which will make my borrower’s Real Estate purchase a very smooth and cost effective transaction over the next.

So, you ask, how should I select the Mortgage Professional to close my loan for me?  I’m glad you asked.  Allow me to give you a few guidelines for starters:

1. Choose a Mortgage Professional who is EXPERIENCED.  Was he selling shoes or washing cars last week and then some buddy of his talked him into “trying out the mortgage business”?  Does he really know what he’s doing?  Has he been originating mortgage for 5-10 years?  Does he do this full-time or this just a hobby or part-time gig? 

NAMBCertified2. Choose a Mortgage Professional who is CERTIFIED.  Has proven to anyone that he knows the laws, the process, the programs and theory and mechanics behind the mortgage industry.  Has he taken courses and exams to measure his competency?  Is his certification a national designation? Is his certification from a professional association who can objectively measure and monitor his expertise or from some mail-order outfit looking to make few bucks?

3. Choose a Mortgage Professional with a GOOD REPUTATION.  Is your selection a true professional who is respected and well-known in his industry.  Who knows him and what kind of work he does?  Who has ever closed a loan with him?  Who can speak for his level of trustworthiness, honesty and attention to detail?  What do you know of his character and personality?

4. Choose a Mortgage Professional who is a PROFESSIONAL.  Does your choice know the market, the industry, the community, the history, the trends and your desires?  Is he a member of his professional association?  Has he been awarded and recognized by his peers and fellow business associates for his contribution to the industry and community?

During the month that your loan is supposed to close it is the most important transaction in your Mortgage Professional’s office.  “Getting it cheap” doesn’t mean much when your “loan guy” drops the ball and makes a mess of the whole deal simply because  he has “never seen anything like this before.”  That stack of bogus ”Good Faith Estimates” collected 30-60 days prior to your closing will mean very little when you find out that returning phone calls, diligently following up on underwriting conditions, and working long hours to insure that all of the bases are covered on your deal are not his priority or part of his work ethic.

Paper is cheap, and ink toner to print fictitious loan estimates is even cheaper.  Experience, Certification, a Good Reputation and Professionalism are priceless life-long attributes and qualities you want in your Mortgage Professional.  Leave the spreading of such worthless papers to those lying, low-balling, bait-n-switching, short-termers who do not deserve to work with someone like you who, understandably, expect it to get done right the first time.


New Appraisal Rules Bad for Consumers and Recovery

June 9, 2009

By Brian Short, CMC, CRMS, GMA

Beginning on May 1st of this year (2009) any home buyer or homeowner getting a new mortgage on their house will be up-charged $150-$250 for their appraisal and generally charged an additional $968 to close their new loan!  You mean, you never heard about this?  You thought the government was doing all it could to stimulate the struggling housing industry?  Guess again!

A year ago, one attorney general in New York, with a famous last name,

NY AG Andrew Cuomo

NY AG Andrew Cuomo

Cuomo,  struck a deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to keep them out of a potentially very ugly and very public law suit because of blind eyes they had been turning to a now bankrupt bank, Washington Mutual. 

You see, WaMu (as they are known in the banking world) had a side business they were operating where they started an Appraisal Management Firm where they required their loans to include an appraisal only from those “independent” appraisers who would join their firm and work for 3/4 of what most professional-level appraisers would work. 

Keep in mind, this did not lower the cost to the consumer.  Their appraisals still cost the same.  It was simply another income stream for the bank and a way to control who did their appraisals.  These appraisers soon learned who “buttered their bread” and were very careful to give the federally chartered bank the value they needed to get their loan closed.  Sounds fishy, huh?  YOU BET IT DOES!

Now enters the young Cuomo, called Andrew, with his eyes on bigger political prizes.  He uncovers this corruption and sues WaMu, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – who all seemed to know that WaMu was doing this.  (Countrywide/Bank of America STILL own their Appraisal Management firm – Landsafe!)  To head off this embarrassing high-profile lawsuit they struck an “out-of-court” settlement which goes far beyond the jurisdiction of the state attorney general.

He asked for, and received, assurances that no Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans would ever be accepted by federally chartered banks who required that their appraisals were done by their own appraisal management firms?  Right?  Wrong!!  Wrong!!  Wrong!!

This new agreement which went into effect on May 1st exempted ALL FEDERALLY CHARTERED BANKS!  The new agreement, crafted in Albany, NY was never approved by Congress or any state legislature. It was drawn up in some back-room to avoid a trial against a corrupt bank doing corrupt business with a corrupt Appraisal Management firm they owned – most likely known about by both corrupt Government Sponsored Entities (GSE’s) Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae!  And to top it off, ALL FEDERALLY CHARTERED BANKS are exempt!  This new “back-room agreement” only affects mortgage brokers and bankers who are generally supervised or chartered by state banking regulators.

WaMu is NoMoIf that was not enough, it now requires all appraisals to be ordered through APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT FIRMS!!!  This very same corrupt system that WaMu used to artificially inflate their appraisal values to ensure that their loans would close – making sure that no independent third parties were involved in the process of assigning values to the properties under consideration!  What?!?!? 

I thought it was the corrupt Appraisal Management Firm model of business that had proven itself to be untrustworthy in the New York back-room in that courthouse in Albany?  Why is it that Mr. Cuomo would wrongly insist that ALL APPRAISALS now be ordered and up-charged by centralized corporate middle-men who do not know local property values, local building standards, and local business practices.  This new layer of New York mandated bureaucracy is required all across the country without a single vote or hearing from industry insiders on how it would negatively affect the struggling mortgage and Real Estate industries. 

These “middle-men” are unregulated by any federal or state agency but have been given the task of arranging for 70-80% of all mortgages being closed in the country and up-charging the cost of that appraisal by $150-$250 per order and passing that cost on to the unassuming buyer or homeowner.  Those $300 appraisals are now costing $400 – $500 for someone outside the state to assign the work to someone with whom they have a working agreement who may or may not live in the area, ever work in the area, or have ever researched the housing market in the area of where the appraisal needs to be done. 

What is their qualification for getting to do this appraisal for this Appraisal Management Firm?  They have promised to work cheap and fast!  Is that who you want to do your appraisal?  Cheap and fast?!?  Who benefits from this arrangement?  The host of newly formed unregulated and unsupervised Appraisal Management Firms are making out like bandits!  Everyone else in the transaction is supervised by a state or federal agency or governing board – Realtors, Mortgage Professionals, Home Inspectors, Insurance Agents, Surveyors, Builders, Title Agents, Appraisers – they’re all tested, licensed, and regulated.  Who tests, licenses or regulates the Appraisal Management Firms?  Why should they be making any money in this transaction?  What are they professionals at doing?  Looking at the next name on a list of random appraisers who have agreed to work for what they will pay them – even if they are not local professionals themselves.

It is reported that this new layer of middle-men have added another 5-10 days on the already very slow loan underwriting timetable causing delays in loan closings which cost the borrower an additional $500-$1,000 to extend the rate lock so they still receive the rate they agreed to receive at the time of the loan application.  Some have estimated that this new over-reaching agreement will cost Americans $2.8 BILLION EVERY YEAR and cause weeks of delays in closing Real Estate mortgages!

Let me make sure I get this right – the consumer is paying anywhere from $650- $1,250 to get an inferior appraisal done which takes longer to get back simply because a nationally chartered bank had an Appraisal Management Firm in their “back pocket” and they were so corrupt that they are no longer in business.  That was the punishment put on all American borrowers by one attorney general in one state up in the northeast because he had dirt on some crooks at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?  This can’t be good! 

Would you like to join the thousands of housing industry professionals in calling those who forced this on you and your neighbors without a single vote or hearing?  CLICK HERE to see who you can call and make your voice of protest heard.


It’s STILL All About CREDIT!

June 1, 2009

By Brian Short, CMC, CRMS, GMA

Six months after we were told that giving the auto industries $30 BILLION would save them (in spite of the SCREAMING from nobodies like this author and others! See: http://promortgagematters.com/2008/12/05/are-they-still-clueless-a-time-for-real-ideas-to-move-forward/) GM (now affectionately referred to as “Government” Motors!) has taken our money with them – down the drain!GM

However, that’s not all!  This NEW PLAN to “restructure” GM involves another $50 BILLION from the US Government to this company which is now owned, in part, by the very thugs and shysters (the UAW) who helped bring them to their knees rather than give concessions to keep their employer solvent.  Now GM is owned by the US Government and being run by this Administration (headed by the “Community Organizer in Chief”)  the Unions put in office with the help of  the Black Panther club-toting “poll monitors” and ACORN.

GM stock is now trading at $.70 and has been taken off the Dow 30 but the UAW retirement plan is getting the backing of the US Federal Government.  What about all of those other retirement funds which had played by the rules and bought GM stock when it was selling for $90 at it peak?  Who is backing and guaranteeing those retirees? 

Why does this administration feel the obligation to artificially prop up the union retirees at the expense of the non-union retirees?  Would it have anything about securing future votes or rewarding them for past votes?  Is this really good for our free market economy?  Does this plan to pour another $50-$100 BILLION into GM before the end of 2009 really do anything for 100 MILLION non-union workers who are still fighting every week to make their house payments and keep their jobs?

frozen_credit_marketJust as a reminder, this economic crisis was brought about because of the loss of credit – first in the housing industry, then for business owners, college students, auto dealers, big-box retail chains, etc.  We have now all felt the crash of the loss of credit and free-flowing funds on the secondary banking markets. 

To continue to throw BILLIONS of dollars at each of these failing industries without fixing the PRIME ROOT of this disaster is like trying to use a “Sham-Wow!” to fix a broken dam.  There may be water all over the road but that is not hardly the problem.  Some major concrete reconstruction at the source of the cracks is what is required to keep the water from running over the road.

The issue at stake is shoring up the banking credit markets so the other industries dependent on free flowing credit (i.e. housing, autos, retail, college loans, etc.) can begin to normalize.  Propping up other industries before the banking and credit markets are stabilized is still “throwing good money after bad.” (My dad always said this.  I’m not real sure what it means.  However, I think you get my point!)

During Bill Clinton’s successful run for President against an originally economy%20stupidassumed unbeatable George H. W. Bush, who had become nearly an overnight national hero for a seemingly bloodless war to remove Saddam Hussein from his occupation of Kuwait, was given its momentum from a phrase coined by campaign adviser James Carville in 1992 when he chimed “It’s the Economy, Stupid.”  He turned the debate from Bush’s noble handling of foreign affairs to the faltering economy (which Bush had attempted to fix by caving in on his pledge  – “Read My Lips” – for no new taxes during his administration to pacify an uncooperative Democratically controlled Congress).

The Clinton campaign continued to hammer out it focus on the economy -”It’s the Economy, Stupid!”  – and they changed public opinion away from the foreign affairs hero in favor of a small-town southern Governor who had never lived or worked in Washington, DC.

Once again, the attention of the public must be turned – “It’s the Credit Market, Stupid!” – to get this currently distracted administration away from simply returning campaign favors and shoring up organized gangsterism and thugery shrouded in “labor protection” movements and “community organizations.”  The American public must see through this type of “Chicago Style” politics and demand that our elected representatives quit passing out money they don’t have in order to make promises they can’t keep at the expense of generations they won’t ever meet!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.